Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:22

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Thank you.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Do all you people that took the "jab" feel lied to yet?

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Thousands of Kroger, Albertsons grocery store workers vote to strike - KIRO 7 News Seattle

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Why do British people always write "xxx" after their names?

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Trump’s budget puts Huntsville-made spacecraft on the chopping block - AL.com

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

What is it like to be a Christian in Iran?

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

What’s next?

Struggles Finally Start Coming To An End For 3 Zodiac Signs On June 10, 2025 - YourTango

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Aaron Rodgers Is Married Now - The Cut

Russia can stop this any time.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Sam Altman biographer Keach Hagey explains why the OpenAI CEO was ‘born for this moment’ - TechCrunch

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

New paper pushes back on Apple’s LLM ‘reasoning collapse’ study - 9to5Mac